Merged
Conversation
Added browser user integration guide to docs. It includes a guide for integrating into an existing browser use implementation as well as starting from scratch with our app template.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Performed full review of 67a3532...9949471
Analysis
- The OpenAPI snippet updates appear to be automated regeneration - ensure these changes are intended and properly validated
- New proxy-related endpoints are being added, which expands the API surface area - consider if this expansion needs additional security review or documentation
- Integration maintains compatibility with existing code but may introduce dependencies on Kernel's cloud infrastructure that should be clearly communicated to users
Tip
⚡ Quick Actions
This review was generated by Mesa.
Actions:
Slash Commands:
/review- Request a full code review/review latest- Review only changes since the last review/describe- Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration/help- Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options
9 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings
juecd
reviewed
Sep 24, 2025
Contributor
juecd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 comment + could you double check the proxy additions in this commit are intentional?
| ) | ||
| client.browsers.delete_by_id( | ||
| "id", | ||
| "htzv5orfit78e1m2biiifpbv", |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nope - wondering if that's from Hiro's work? I didn't change that
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
| <CodeGroup> | |||
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was this from another commit that's not yet in main?
Updated to UV method and included dependency name.
Simplified to use uv add instead of two steps
Updated kernel import
To avoid confusion, changing name of class to client instead of the package name kernel
juecd
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added browser user integration guide to docs. It includes a guide for integrating into an existing browser use implementation as well as starting from scratch with our app template.
Implementation Checklist
Testing
mintlify devworks (see installation here)Visual Proof
TL;DR
Adds a new guide for integrating Kernel's Browser APIs into automation scripts.
Why we made these changes
To provide developers with a clear guide for integrating our Browser APIs, covering both starting a new project from our template and adding it to an existing implementation.
What changed?
integrations/browser-use.mdx, a new guide for using Kernel with browser automation.create-kernel-apptemplate.create,list,retrieve,delete).Description generated by Mesa. Update settings